Wednesday, October 8, 2008

undeclared



i first watched this entire series one afternoon/night. i was living in boston, & it was the night before i was meant to move out of my packard's corner apartment (72 gardner street, for those of you keeping tabs on me). all of my belongings were packed & most of them were already brought home. & i hated my roommates. so the options were leave the apartment or stay inside my room. because i was feeling particularly lazy & unhappy at my living situation, i decided to stay inside.

i had almost nothing to entertain me. but thankfully, before i packed my boxes of DVDs into my mum's SUV, i had decided to keep undeclared with me in case i needed something to watch. & watch it i did. the ENTIRE SERIES.

but really, that's not much of a feat. because, like its predecessor, freaks & geeks, this one only aired for one season (an incomplete season at that. one or two episodes never aired at all). which is sad. because both shows deserved at least a second season.

(freaks & geeks deserved a lot more than that, but that's for another blog entry someday down the line).

undeclared is certainly no freaks & geeks. but it's still quite enjoyable. it's pretty light-hearted & fun. i think it pretty accurately portrays college, without getting too bogged down with the emotions involved. but the dialogue & plots are realistic. i believe what's going on.

according to wikipedia, judd apatow has stated, "one reason for the death of college shows is that it's difficult to be honest about campus life on network or basic cable. it's hard to portray truthfully. the truth is, kids are high, drunk and having sex. no matter what you do, you're fudging it."

ok, so maybe judd apatow is right. but they did a pretty good job. after all, lloyd does have plenty of sex. (not that it's any wonder why! look at him! he's a cutie!)



& the gang do their fair share of drinking (they even empty a keg into every single cup in their dorm room & try to drink it all before it goes flat). certainly things were left out of the overall college experience, but undeclared gives it a good try.

i think what really makes it great is the casting. i really love the male casting choices. seth rogan! charlie hunnam! in fact, all four of the main boys do a really good job with this material.

the girls, however, i was less than pleased with. carla gallo, i apparently do not like you in anything you are in. & monica keena! fuck you, i didn't like you on dawson's creek & i don't like you on undeclared. get off my blog!

the true casting gem, however, is in lizzie's (carla gallo, ick) creepy stalker boyfriend, eric.

this is seriously good stuff here.



jason segel, you are always great. you are welcome on my blog anytime.



Tuesday, October 7, 2008

carnivale



so this show makes very little sense. but in the good way, like twin peaks.

i really WANT to like this show. i think i do, but honestly i can't quite tell yet. & to be fair, since disc one only had two episodes on it, i hardly think i've gotten enough of a taste of it to really make a judgment either way.

my main problem with this one is casting. i believe almost everything that happens, but two of the girls in particular, clea duvall (as sham puts it, "who authorized her having the same hair for 10 years?") & carla gallo (i'll have more to say about her soon, i'm watching undeclared right now) totally take me out of it.

i mean, check it out.



he totally looks right. she does not.



she looks like she's from 2005 & they stuck an old-timey dress on her. i agree with sham; it's totally the hair.

other than that, i'm pretty ok with this show. i'm interested & curious, which i guess is the point. i'm not supposed to know what's going on, so i'm just taking it all in & enjoying the ride.

Monday, October 6, 2008

the sopranos



i just never got into this show when it aired.

i had no real desire to watch it, & the only information i knew about it was what my parents, fans of the show, told me throughout the years. & nothing they ever said seemed interesting enough to make me want to delve into this series.

but i borrowed it for season one disc one & decided to give it a fair chance.

it's good, just like everyone says. the acting is good, the characters are really solid from the very first episode, & the plot is definitely interesting.

but i guess it's just not my type of show. i found myself sort of bored & really not caring about the characters or the plot. but i really don't think that's anything against the show. i think it's more on my end - this show just isn't for me.

oh, & no offense to the actors but every time the kids were on screen



i wanted to fucking kill myself. could they have PICKED more annoying kids!?

i think i'm more interested in sitting down with someone who has seen the whole series so i can find out what happens than i am in seeing the rest of the series.

it wasn't bad, by any means.

just really not for me.

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

gossip girl



i have a soft spot in my heart for teenage dramas centering around rumours, sex, drugs, high school, & stabbing each other in the back.

so really, gossip girl is the perfect show for me. i honestly just can't get enough of glossy lipstick, pouty girls, sex-maniac foxy guys, & a cast of characters who cheat on each other, lie to each other, & play each other for their own gain. bonus points if it all takes place in high school.

& while we see very little of these friends actually going to school, they are of the right age & the controversial issues are certainly there. the new 90210 was touted as the west coast gossip girl, but so far from what i've seen (& i'm enjoying the campy 90210, don't get me wrong) 90210 has nothing on gossip girl. maybe it's just east coast fashion (it IS different, i assure you) or just that the acting is so much better, but gossip girl is a show with style.

if the new 90210 is "fuck me pumps"



then gossip girl is "come tie me up & then fuck me boots".



& i honestly do mean that in the best way possible. on both sides. 90210 is what it is. it's not nearly as edgy as it's claiming to be, but it's fun. gossip girl, on the other hand, is dead serious. these kids aren't playing around. they mean business, & man is it a mean business.

i'm not from NY, but i am from the east coast. i guess we have a different definition of drama there. or, maybe it's just that gossip girl is willing to be more controversial. but it's a really glam-ed up & polished end result, whatever the reasons are. the acting is pretty solid, the characters are well-defined, & the plot is, well, wicked. (omfg).

my only complaint so far is how much the narrator sounds like sarah jessica parker. it's almost like gossip girl thought, for five seconds, that it wanted to be the new sex & the city. i've got news for you, gossip girl: you aren't sex & the city. but that's really ok. i much prefer you.

you know you love me. xoxo.


Wednesday, September 24, 2008

supernatural



man, i really did not want to like this show.

so much so, i had convinced myself that it looked really lame & that i would never, in a million years, actually identify with it. i respected people who were into it (i have a few friends who really do like it) but i just always assumed that it wasn't for me.

i was also completely unable to separate supernatural from smallville in my mind. i couldn't remember which was which, & would always use the wrong title when talking about one of the shows. when supernatural disc one began, i even said to myself, "fuck, which one is superman!?"

but boy, was i wrong about this show. i mean, seriously, i couldn't have been any more wrong.

this is exactly my type of show. i don't know if i was completely blind before, or just totally unwilling to give supernatural a chance. but i almost hate myself for not having watched it before this weekend.

in fact, as soon as disc one ended, i turned to sham & began brainstorming how we could get our hands on the rest of the season. i texted friends to see if i could borrow it. i even thought about buying it. i was immediately hooked!

the brothers play off each other so well. their bickering is really enjoyable to watch, & funny. because they can interact in this way, their characters seem pretty solid, even though the audience still does not know much about them. the younger brother is definitely more emotional, & the older brother is a bit of a hothead. they are nearly polar opposites & they don't really get along (unless they are putting their heads together to solve a case). but that's what makes their relationship really entertaining to watch. despite all the supernatural events occurring, the brothers are so real that it's easy to get sucked into the show. even if you don't believe in ghosts & goblins, you care about the brothers.

the effects are also top-notch. the first episode began with a doozy & i was pretty convinced the rest of the episodes would not be able to live up to it. again, i could not have been more wrong.



i'm totally hooked on supernatural.

& luckily for me, my dad is going to let me borrow the rest.

supernatural, i promise to never "accidentally" call you smallville again.

Monday, September 22, 2008

rescue me



now this is a good example of what a pilot episode should be. plot? strong. acting? stellar. characters? SOLID. this pilot puts many other pilots i've watched to shame. i don't know how many times throughout keeping this blog i've had to say to myself, "stick with it. most shows improve after the pilot episode."

luckily for me & sham, this time around was a real treat.

tommy (or, denis leary) begins the show with a whole lot of personality. he's tortured, angsty, nearly divorced, & a relapsing alcoholic. his fellow firefighters are all dealing with 9/11 in their own, fucked up ways. one begins writing poetry to deal with his feelings, only to find out from his wife that his poems are awful & that she thinks he's less of a man for writing them. another goes on an anti-gay crusade. even the two young ones have a few problems of their own.

i love all the characters & i was fully engrossed in the story. does his daughter live!? does his wife divorce him!? does he ever stop seeing the ghosts of his dead cousin, fellow firefighters, & two little children he tried to save? most importantly, is he going to be ok? is he going to survive the fucked up life we're seeing him in?

i certainly hope so. but i really think it's the ride there that's going to be most entertaining to watch.

good for you, denis leary.



& damn, are you foxy.

oz; 2



sorry HBO, but this one bored me.

& i don't understand the narrated sections. i'm sure i'm just missing something.

admittedly, the second episode was better than the first. & the third was better than the second.

but really, i just wasn't into this scattered show. too many characters, too little plot.

Sunday, September 21, 2008

Oz

yawn.

i did not like this at all. i was bored very quickly. i have heard great things, but wonder if they were about season two on because that's when christopher meloni comes on. i mean, i love him.

anyway. after three episodes i almost cared about the characters. almost. the storyline is really scattered; you're shown a bunch of men and their issues but it's not cohesive.

plus, jk simmons is in it playing a crazy aryan asshole. he was maybe my favorite part because i just pretended i was still watching Burn After Reading and he was kidding the whole time.
no, no, burn the body. get rid of it.

Friday, September 19, 2008

eureka; 2



ok, so this show is pretty formulaic.

something mysterious & sci-fi related happens in the town & the police get called in to solve the problem. just when it seems like they are never going to be able to crack the case, jack carter gets a brilliant idea & figures everything out. yay! end of episode.

but i still have to admit, for a show like this, the formula works pretty well. the characters aren't totally in-depth, & the plot is certainly repetitive. but, like i said in my entry about the dead zone, people like case-based television shows. it's hard to be glued to your television screen every week. it's nice to be able to tune in or out whenever you want.

that being said, i don't know if the characters or plot are strong enough to keep anyone tuning in all the time. but the show is definitely quirky & fun enough for me to want to tune in at least a little more. that is to say, i wouldn't go out of my way to watch more of this one, but if i turned on the television (& magically had the sci-fi channel) & it was on, i would watch it. at least, until i realized i had something better to be doing.

eureka is cute & entertaining enough. i like sci-fi, though. so who knows.

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

the dead zone



stupid dialogue? oh right, it's steven king.

driving directly into an 18-wheeler? oh right, it's steven king.

in a coma for six years? & a full recovery? really?

oh right, it's steven king.

don't get me wrong, i love steven king.



but his writing can be a little corny. oh, who am i kidding? he's not exactly known for his fantastic dialogue & really in-depth characters.

but he is a pretty damn good storyteller (or, more accurately, can be a really good storyteller). so, in theory, the dead zone is pretty cool. it's about a guy who wakes up from a six-year coma & finds that when he touches people, he can see things about them. yes, i know that's vague. but so is the show. apparently it can be in the past, in the future, in a POSSIBLE future, happening to someone else near them. oh, & it works with objects, too. but only SOME objects.

it's all very sci-fi & very mysterious. which, in my opinion, is cool.

anthony michael hall ("
you gave me a birth control pill? do you know what that can do to a guy my age? ") does an alright job with the whole, going into trances thing. i have a feeling his acting improves over time, as he gets more used to the character. i mean, the show apparently ran for six seasons, so he had to be doing something right.

i can't totally speak to how the plot ends up working out. i have a feeling each episode is him trying to solve a crime or some other mystery that he receives from touching objects or people. that's what it seems like, based on the first few episodes. which is a good idea. people like case-based television shows.

this show is pretty cool. i don't know if i could ever get like, REALLY into it. or if i would ever want to buy multiple seasons & have the dead zone marathons. but i would totally watch it again if someone loaned me disc two.


Monday, September 15, 2008

Eureka

titles: "is that fucking papyrus font? it is! fuck this show. fucking over." i swear, some people.



I have a hard time understanding scifi i think. i mean, i have a difficult time suspending my disbelief. all i can think is "this is weird!" and i never really accept it and move on. i don't know. the show seems pretty standard. we're supposed to follow the main character because, like us, he has no idea what's going on. fair enough.
i do like the 15 year old because she's such a mouthy little bitch. she pretty much has the same lines as if she was playing an estranged wife instead of being the frustrated daughter. i'm into verbally violent young women. who knows why?
I also like the juxtaposition of the government as we know it with the strictly intellectual town. throw the military into anything involving free thinking (and science!) and you're bound to get a rise out of me. creationism & evolution! church & state!

In Living Color, 2

i mostly just want to say "ditto" to jessica. i don't get it, but it's not targeted at me, so that's alright. i completely appreciate the show. i actually did laugh at one of the skits, though apparently it's the skit that replaced the date-rape one. jim carey is the ship captain (or, "boat pilot") who was responsible for a giant oil spill. as his wife does the dishes with her back to him, she rehashes the details of the spill and cleanup. carey, meanwhile, is re-enacting it all (accidently) with a horrific coffee spill that he tries to soak up with flour. it winds up with him lighting the kitchen on fire. stellar stuff, really.


i suppose i could get into the show on some level. i'm sure you could show me great skits and i'd love them. but all in all, it feels like an off-season of SNL. there's the occasional thing that is hilarious, but as a whole, i can't really be bothered to wait around for it. thank god for the internet though.

sub point: i hate madtv.

Friday, September 12, 2008

rome



i didn't NOT like this show, but i didn't like it either.

it's very well done. the costumes, props, & sets seem to be pretty spot on.

i don't know how accurate it is, historically. but i do know that i think it gets a little bogged down with the history, like the tudors does from time to time. i don't really care about any of the characters, because so far they are only representations of a certain time period in history. they don't particularly stand out for me, & they don't really seem like real people. in the first episode alone, i couldn't tell half of the guys apart.

i feel like this show could be good, if it begins to focus more on the characters than the history/plot. this may happen, i don't know.

i've heard really good things about it, so i won't hate on it completely.

i like the tudors, but maybe only because jonathan rhys meyers is so hot. rome doesn't have a jonathan rhys meyers. at least, not yet.

reno 911!



i'm not 100% sure what to say about this show. i've got no really in-depth thoughts about it. & my online research proved that there are really no secrets about this show to be revealed.

all in all, it's just hilarious. i mean, i always make a point to watch it whenever i catch it on TV. watching 8 episodes back-to-back may have been a little much. & since you don't need to watch every episode to stay caught up on any kind of "plot" or "character development," watching every season is really not needed. it's maybe more of a watch-it-when-it's-on but-don't-kill-yourself-if-you-miss-an-episode kind of show.

but honestly, it's really just hilarious.

felicity



so my major memory for this show is that a boyfriend of mine in high school got angry that i watched it one night instead of calling him to talk. what i never admitted to him, & haven't really thought about until right now, is that i was only using this show to avoid calling him for whatever reason. i think it was his birthday, & i was uncomfortable with the expectations that had been placed on me to be the "perfect girlfriend" in such situations. & i bailed, majorly, on calling him. but, i mean, i called him after.

needless to say, i obviously didn't remember much about this show. i think i did watch it. at least a few times. i remembered all the characters, & of the 4 episodes i watched, i remembered the plot of at least two of them.

i think that felicity gets a bit of a bad reputation. every time i mention it, someone inevitably groans & someone else mentions "that time she cut her hair". i mean, yeah, cutting her hair was probably a bad idea. but the show continued for two more years after that ill-fated season. so they must have been doing something right.

right?

one thing i liked about this show before i even began watching it is that there are only 4 seasons. so it's not overwhelming to want to get into, & it exists in it's own little world of college. she begins the show as a freshman & ends it as a senior. i don't know if the last show does any kind of a fast forward so we can see where all the characters end up after their lives at the university of new york, but i almost sort of hope not. i LIKE that the show exists in a little box, like a package tied with a bow. here is college life, complete.

i'm going to be honest here. i liked this show.

more than i thought i was going to, & definitely more than i did in 1998. probably because in 1998, i had absolutely no idea what college was. it was an idea to me only, something i saw in my future but of which i had no real concept. so can i relate to felicity more, having gone through my own 4 (to be fair, 3.5) years?

i don't know. i think so.

in my memory i remember felicity as "that show that tried to recreate dawson's creek for college kids". i mean, she's got a little dawson in her. she's over analytical about boys, life, friends, & classes. but that's about it. she's much more reserved than dawson is. in fact, i liken her more to angela chase than dawson leery. felicity is painfully shy, so much so that, even though she followed ben to new york, she had only ever had two conversations with him before (conversations that she remembers in painstaking detail). it's almost painful to watch her try to interact with ben, noel, her professors, basically anyone she meets. she's awkward & young.

unlike dawson's creek, we don't pick up with felicity already having a strong friend group in place. in fact, when the series begins, she doesn't have ONE friend. & when she does befriend julie, they have a very rocky start (basically due to the fact that julie & ben like each other more than they like felicity).

we also learn that felicity didn't do much in high school. she was very quiet, & seems to have done only what her parents wanted her to do. i don't even know if she had any friends then, either. we certainly never hear about any of them.

so really, we get to see felicity evolve from the very beginning. she's got no friends, no life, & almost no personality. she's got to cut out a place for herself in the world from scratch. imagine, dawson leery at, say, age 3.

i'm going to admit this again. i was into it. i'm not sure where her relationships with ben & the resident advisor noel crane (who has a webpage. seriously, go to that link) will go (although thanks, wikipedia, for spoiling a few details for me). i don't know who she will befriend next. or where her adventures in college will take her. & i'm interested. which has got to be a good sign.

apparently in later seasons, the writers began to run out of ideas for story lines. i mean, i guess there's only SO much drama that can go on during college.... (NOT). also, apparently the original writer was 32 & claimed to be 19 so there was a bit of controversy going on about this show.
so i can't really vouch for the entire series. which is why i'm not giving this one more than four records as a rating.

but, i really & genuinely give felicity four records. i'm into it, & i hope that one day i can try out disc two. & who knows, honestly, maybe a lot more than that.

...at least until she cuts her hair.



just kidding.

Thursday, September 11, 2008

mad men; 2



i hate myself for not having watched this show before last night.

i wish i was being melodramatic, but i'm not.

to be fair, sham & i don't have cable. so we don't get AMC. i wanted to watch this one from the very beginning but couldn't. so then i had my dad download it for me & mail it to me, but i really dropped the ball on that one also. i still have the DVDs, but i never once watched them. since i started this blog, i keep meaning to watch mad men online to review, but i never did. i've had the pilot loaded onto my firefox about three times now, but things keep distracting me or work keeps making me busy.

but seriously? SERIOUSLY?



i've been missing out. i mean, LOOK AT THOSE CLOTHES. i would give anything to be able to (afford to) dress like that every day of my life. the set design & costumes are absolutely stunning. i never ONCE didn't buy that these people are living in the early 1960s. every damn thing feels accurate to me, even down to the drinking glasses, cigarette cases, & home decor. i wasn't alive during this time period, but for 45 minutes at a time, mad men allows me to pretend that i was (& thank you for that, mad men. because it's not really a secret that i wish i could live in this era).

the acting is also superb. while watching the show, sham actually turned to me & said, "oh yeah, i forgot that people can act." especially on TV! i mean, i had begun to believe that ANYONE could get on TV, regardless of any actual talent. but thank you, mad men, for finally getting it right & finding people who could act. it really, really, really makes a difference.

ok, plot. sure, the clothes & hotties are what initially attracted me to this show, but will the plot keep me watching it? yes. absolutely. yes, yes, yes, yes, yes. on the first disc alone, peggy basically gets called a "strumpet" by her gyno because she wants birth control. then, she comes onto her boss & sleeps with a co-worker who is about to be married! yikes! don is already cheating on his wife (who almost killed her kids in a car accident because her hands keep going numb), yet he is frustrated because she seems sad. then, he had the audacity to tell a female client that he will not let a woman "talk to him like that" when she tells him his ideas are stupid. etc etc etc.

fantastic.

i don't feel like i'm watching TV; i feel like i'm watching a movie. a movie that i never want to end. do you hear me, mad men? i never want you to end! never!

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

mad men

first off, apologies all around. jessica is single-handedly keeping up this blog. what can i say? i'm a busy lady and i can't really blog when i'm at work. so how about this, i'm going to make really short updates, and then perhaps come back to them later if i feel like i have more to say. we'll leave the pontificating to my other half.

short sum up: everyone is right this show is great. i love when i feel like i'm not even watching tv, but am watching a movie. there is acting. there is costume and set design. i care about the story lines. i give my general applause to this show and feel guilty that i had not seen it until tonight.

plus- have you seen the outfits? fucking killer.


loves it.

Tuesday, September 9, 2008

The Tick (live action), 2

it's true, i watched all 6 episodes. it's an absolutely ridiculous show. very over the top, but that's what you want. i promise. it's bizarre and funny- i some how liked it and didn't like it at the same time. i think i got a little bored because i wasn't dedicating my full attention to the show. this is definitely something to watch with friends. comic dork friends if you have them. (i say that lovingly.)

i am going to agree with jessica- batmanuel is the best. maybe it's the sexy accent, maybe it's that he's a womanizer and kind of a dick, but i fell for batmanuel. even if his outfit was ridiculous.


did you see captain liberty's outfit?


yeah. that star is cutout for cleav. amazing. certainly just more of a demonstration of the hilarious satire that is The Tick. there was actually an episode about not donning the costume and wearing normal clothes. turns out superheros should stay in their outfits so they don't freak out their dates. long story.

i'm into it though.

the tick (live action)



the best part of this show is batmanuel. seriously. if you watch it for any reason, let that reason be batmanuel (& yes, he does have a batmanuelmobile). i promise that you will not be disappointed.

though apparently, america at large WAS disappointed by this one. it lasted only nine episodes, a far cry from the successful three year run of the animated series in the mid-90s. maybe adults simply don't understand the tick as well as children do? in the first episode alone, i remember sham turning to me & saying "oh, sad, is he just stupid?" as the tick began babbling about his duty to protect his bus station (apparently in the original comics, he actually escapes from a nearby mental institution). but we caught on fairly quickly.

he's not stupid, it's actually brilliant parody.

i only watched three of the six episodes on disc one, but i didn't not finish due to boredom or lack of interest. my DVD player sort of tricked me & stopped playing after three episodes. sham did finish the whole disc though, so let's wait for her entry with bated breath.

with only three episodes of the tick under my belt, i liked it enough to write this entry. i know, i know. what did i learn from two guys, a girl, & a pizza place? if anything, not to judge a whole show by less episodes than are actually on disc one. but, for this one, i'll have to make an exception.

i mean, the show certainly makes very little sense. there's almost no backstory & the characters are little more than goofy caricatures of superheroes. but, that's exactly what makes this show work.

it takes place in a world where superheroes do exist, though they are considered by society to be insane & in need of severe therapy to right their mental problems. they have to make their own costumes (except for the tick, who never seems to take it off) & they don't really have super powers aside from their bravery (except for the tick, who apparently is pretty damn strong). batmanuel is even shown with his arm in a cast in one episode. these are superheroes, but they are also real people.

which makes me like this show. a lot. it's pretty zany & out there, but it's certainly a lot of fun. it's what superman, batman, & the like would be if they ACTUALLY existed in the world we live in now. which, in theory, is cool. in practice, perhaps just not mainstream enough for society. but in theory, still very cool.